...
🇨🇳 Meet SonnePower at bauma CHINA 2026   |   Nov. 24–27, 2026   |   Shanghai New International Expo Centre (SNIEC)   |   BOOTH N1.576 🇨🇳 Meet SonnePower at bauma CHINA 2026   |   Nov. 24–27, 2026   |   Shanghai New International Expo Centre (SNIEC)   |   BOOTH N1.576

HED vs SonnePower : CAN Bus Controller Supplier

Table of Contents

CAN bus controllers are a core component of modern mobile machinery, ensuring communication between sensors, actuators, and control units. They are widely used in construction, agriculture, sanitation, mining, and special vehicles. Selecting the right supplier involves comparing technology, programming tools, communication capabilities, and application focus. This article provides an overview of HED and SonnePower, highlighting their differences in controllers and applications.

Company Overview

HED

  • Founded: 1986

  • Headquarters: Hartford, Wisconsin, USA

  • Main Business: Rugged electronic control systems for mobile equipment.

  • Key Products: Controllers, CAN bus displays, keypads, telematics, cameras, and software tools.

  • Industries Served: Construction, agriculture, forestry, rescue, and utility vehicles.

  • Positioning: Focus on multiplexed wiring and intelligent controls to improve machine performance and reduce system cost.

SonnePower

  • Founded: 2007

  • Headquarters: Changsha, China

  • Main Business: Electronic control solutions for mobile machinery and special equipment.

  • Key Products: Controllers, CAN bus displays, I/O modules, keypads, and intelligent motor systems.

  • Industries Served: Construction, agriculture, sanitation, firefighting, mining, ports, and logistics.

  • Positioning: Provides integrated control platforms with programmable hardware and flexible communication interfaces.

HED vs SonnePower:CAN Bus Controller

HED Electronic I/O Controllers

Experience & Positioning

    • Over 35 years in mobile machinery controls.

    • Widely used in heavy-duty and specialized vehicles.

Communication & Programming

      • Supports J1939 and CANopen protocols.

      • Offers programming tools and Board Support Packages (BSP) for OEM customization.

Module Types

  • Master Control Module – runs application software and manages vehicle functions.

  • Client I/O Module – communicates with the master module via CAN.

  • Power Distribution Module – high-power unit integrating control and distribution.

SonnePower Controllers

  • Experience & Positioning

    • Focused on mobile machinery since 2007.

    • Applied in diverse fields such as construction, sanitation, mining, ports, and aerial work platforms.

  • Communication & Programming

    • Interfaces: 2–3 × CAN, RS232, RS485, Ethernet (on some models).

    • Protocols: J1939, CANopen, and custom options.

    • Programming: CoDeSys 3.5 (some models 2.3).

  • I/O & Features

    • I/O range: 18–66 channels, including DI, DO, AI, AO, PWM.

    • Functions: Fast boot (<5s), built-in diagnostics, port protection.

    • Options: Wireless connectivity (WiFi, 4G, BeiDou) and data storage up to 64GB.

Controller Comparison: WIKA vs SonnePower

Feature / AspectHED ControllersSonnePower Controllers
Power Supply12V, 24V, or 12/24V dual8–32VDC wide range across all models
Communication Interfaces1–4 × CAN2–3 × CAN, plus RS232, RS485, Ethernet (on some models)
Supported ProtocolsJ1939, CANopenJ1939, CANopen, Custom Protocols
Total InputsFrom 1+ up to 32+From 18 to 36 on standard models, up to 66 on high-end
Total OutputsFrom 1+ up to 32+From 12 to 20 on standard models, up to 32 on high-end
I/O CapabilityModular: master module, client I/O module, power distribution moduleCompact to high-end models with fixed I/O ranges
Special FeaturesRugged design, BSP support, widely adopted by global OEMsFast boot (<5s), customizable UI, IoT-ready (WiFi, 4G, BeiDou, storage)

Application Comparison

HED Controllers

  • Construction machinery (excavators, loaders, cranes)

  • Defense and military vehicles

  • Rescue and emergency vehicles

  • Utility and municipal equipment

SonnePower Controllers – Main Applications

  • Construction machinery
  • Agricultural equipment
  • Sanitation vehicles
  • Firefighting and rescue vehicles
  • Mining machinery
  • Port equipment
  • Airport ground support equipment
  • Aerial work platforms
  • Logistics machinery
  • Road machinery
  • Oilfield equipment
  • Cranes
  • AGVs (Automated Guided Vehicles)
  • Hydrogen energy systems

Key Differences Between HED and SonnePower

  • Industry Focus

    • HED: strong presence in North America, widely adopted in defense, rescue, and utility vehicles.

    • SonnePower: broader application coverage in construction, sanitation, and industrial vehicles.

  • Design Approach

    • HED: modular system with separate master, client, and distribution modules.

    • SonnePower: integrated controllers with multiple I/O configurations.

  • Communication Options

    • HED: CAN-based with BSP support.

    • SonnePower: CAN plus extended interfaces (RS232, RS485, Ethernet).

  • Geographic Market

    • HED: established mainly in the US and global OEMs with defense and rescue focus.

    • SonnePower: partnerships with Chinese and Asian OEMs, expanding internationally.

FAQs

Q1. What are the main differences between HED and SonnePower controllers?

HED uses a modular design with a master and client I/O, while SonnePower offers integrated controllers with higher I/O counts and broader communication options.

Q2. Do SonnePower controllers support custom protocols?

Yes, SonnePower controllers support J1939, CANopen, and custom protocols.

Q3. Are HED controllers more focused on North America?

Yes, HED has its strongest presence in the North American market, while SonnePower covers broader Asian and international sectors.

Conclusion

HED and SonnePower both provide CAN bus controllers for mobile machinery, but their focus and design strategies differ.

  • HED emphasizes rugged modular systems, often used in defense and rescue vehicles.

  • SonnePower offers integrated, multi-interface controllers applied across a wider range of industries.

Both companies address the core needs of mobile machinery, and the choice depends on application requirements, market region, and desired system flexibility.

Scroll to Top

Contact information

Write for us